CHINAMacroReporter

Why SOE Reform is So Tough

'...SOEs need to reform, because on one hand, many of them have achieved a lot for China. On the other hand, they've actually created quite a lot of harm, in particular in the areas of overcapacity but also in the areas of corruption we've talked about.'
by

|

CHINADebate

February 15, 2017
Why SOE Reform is So Tough

Malcolm Riddell: Okay. Ed, we were talking earlier about SOE reform, state-ownedenterprise reform. I was wondering if you could tell me what's happening now with that.

Ed Tse: As you know, Malcolm, the SOE was somewhat of a double-edged sword for the Chinese government for a long time. The SOEs have helped theChinese government drive a lot of changes in China, because as you know the SOEs are directly owned by the Chinese government.Essentially, each enterprise can carry out the orders from the Chinese government. For a long time, they have actually in a way created a lot of progress for China.

At the same time, the SOEs also have developed a number of major problems, all related to the governance or the lack of proper governance of these enterprises.Malcolm Riddell: What do you mean?

Ed Tse: What I mean is, in a "modern" enterprise, the governance usually carried out through a properly designed board of directors. That board, as you know, provides the checks and balance for the management, and to make sure that things are done in a proper way.

For many SOEs, certainly in the old days, there's no such concept.There's no such concept of a public board of directors, because the SOEs were directly owned by the state, either at the central level or at the local government level. Therefore, a lot of the directors were given directly from the SASAC, which is the state organization which is the caretaker of all the state assets. They could directly or command directions for theSOEs through the chairman, or the so-called general manager, or the CEOof the companies. From a governance standpoint, it took a long time for the SOEs to build proper governance.

Malcolm Riddell: If I understand correctly, the SOEs are also pretty independent of government orders. They're not quite as lockstep with government directives as they might be. Is that right?

Ed Tse: It depends on the sectors that the SOEs are in. If they're in more opensectors, open meaning less regulated, more competition, and so on, theSOEs need to compete with the competitors, and the competitors usually come from either the private sector and/or the multinationals. For those companies, they need to be very agile and to be very market-oriented. By definition, they are less interfered with the government.

On the other hand, as you know, in some other sectors where perhaps it's much more protected, much more monopolized, and in some casesSOEs are in sectors that are considered as national security sectors. In those sectors, certainly there is quite a bit of alignment, in fact in some cases significant alignment, between the enterprise behavior and the government policies.

Malcolm Riddell: I can certainly see that with national security, but let me give you an example. The local government officials don't always listen to the directives from Beijing. They go their own way a lot of times. My understanding is that an awful lot of SOEs do the same thing.

Ed Tse: That's true at the local levels. Certainly very true. In fact, as you know,Malcolm, that is a good cause for much of the overcapacity that we see across many sectors in China, is because many of the locally owned and locally controlled SOEs are trying to do their own things, and therefore there's a lot of repeated investment.

Malcolm Riddell: One of my favorite directives I ever saw from the NDRC was about copper smelting. I forget in which county. It was a directive to shut down a couple of underperforming copper smelters. The directive said specifically, "You can't just shut them down and then move them to another place and open them up again." I thought that gave the idea.

I understand at the local, but at the national level, can we really say that the heads of a lot of these SOEs, the ones that fall in between, not the ones that are competing hard and not the ones that are obviously a matter of national security, but do the ones that are in between sometimes thumb their noses at the directions from the center?

Ed Tse: Yeah, as you know, there's always the check and balance. How do you actually create the balance? On the one hand, the enterprise executives from these SOEs need to deliver value, deliver themselves, because they're measured by SASAC on commercial performance. At the sametime, in many cases, the government would also like them to deliver missions or certain things that is perhaps not entirely conversant.

Let's take, for example, companies in the construction industry. Ofcourse, companies need to create value by doing construction projects on a profitable basis, but nonetheless, as you also know, in some cases some of these infrastructure construction projects can be at least partially motivated by national priorities, for example, building a high speed rail. Does it make sense economically?

If you analyze this from a pure project-based feasibility standpoint, a lot 3of the high-speed rail links are not economically feasible, yet the Chinese government, in particular the SOEs who are involved in this effort,continue to build, and China is still building. It has high-speed rail across the entire country because the Chinese government think that actually beyond some simple analysis of the economic feasibility, there's a multiplier effect on the economic ramifications of having an expansive network of high-speed across all of China and even perhaps beyondChina. That's a state-level or government initiative together with some economic analysis. That's how some of the SOEs needed help.

Malcolm Riddell: We needed the same thing. President Eisenhower created the national highway system for the same kind of multiplier effect. I'm talking about something a little bit different. What I'm saying is, when you talk about governance, and if we consider that if we take the premise that SOEs just follow the directions from whatever area of central government they report to, then how and why is governance a problem at all?

Ed Tse: Governance is critical because on one hand the executives need to have a clear check and balance on the decisions that they make. Some of that has to be with respect to whether or not a certain investment is justified and is to the benefit of the enterprises. That's one function of the board.

The other function of the board is to make sure that there is enough,what's the word, transparency in the decision-making, because you don't want to end up with inappropriate behavior, and therefore inappropriate benefits for individuals, in particular for the senior people in the company. As you know, Malcolm, some of the SOEs are now known as a hotbed for corruption for the senior people. That's why [inaudible00:13:59] corporate governance are coming.

Malcolm Riddell: This is the point I'm getting at. This is the contradiction that I see. If we start with the idea that SOEs are controlled by the government, then we would assume that that means the executives in there take orders from the government and act accordingly. I don't think that's the way it works.We see resistance. We see corruption. We see all kinds of activities that are going on there. How can you put a system of governance in place if you're still taking orders from the central government?

Ed Tse: Right. When I said the government, the SOEs taking their orders from the government meaning if the government wanted to direct an enterprise ora bunch of enterprises in a certain direction, in theory the executives from the SOEs would need to follow or should follow. Indeed, I would say most if not all of them do follow, but in the process of these executives doing their everyday decisions, and perhaps in some cases if they need to make a couple of investments or engage in a certain kind of project and so on, at least in the past, many of the executives would probably get 4their hands into the [inaudible 00:15:35] and perhaps try to benefit through much of the incoming investment. All things happens. Following the direction of the government, from a policy standpoint, that happens.At the same time, corruption also happens.

Malcolm Riddell: Let me take this from a different point of view. Quite often, the CEO of a major state-owned enterprise will do that for a few years, and switch out to a ministry post, and then maybe do some provincial post, and back toan SOE. Really we've got the same crowd managing the SOEs as are in the government. They're all in the same pool. Is that accurate?

Ed Tse: That's pretty accurate, you're right. In a way, the people in government and the people who lead the SOEs are from the same pool, in a way theelites in the Communist Party. These are people who considered as pretty capable and actually have a way to manage their career through the Communist Party. Essentially, it's more or less the same pool of people, but as you know, there are some 800,000 members of the Communist Party, so it's a pretty big pool.

Malcolm Riddell: I'm not disagreeing with that. What I'm trying to clarify for our viewers is that what we have here is a very different system, very different structure,than what we have say in the West, where you have an independent enterprise that, if it's a public company, has public stock holders. It has responsibilities to them. It has a board that is meant to make independent decisions based on the best interest of the companies and the shareholders. Executives are beholden to the board, and when one of them leaves, he probably goes on to be an executive in another company,whereas in the system in China, we have a very deep pool of people,perhaps, who take on various roles in their careers both in government and in industry. It's a very different system than what we're used to here,and I think it's one of the things that makes the governance question particularly hard to understand.

Ed Tse: It is certainly very different than the so-called Western system. That's why the SOEs need to reform, because on one hand, many of them have achieved a lot for China. On the other hand, they've actually created quite a lot of harm, in particular in the areas of overcapacity but also in the areas of corruption we've talked about.

More

CHINAMacroReporter

February 8, 2021
Why the Anglosphere sees eye to eye on China
‘Some of America’s European allies are very wary of what they fear will be a new cold war with China. By contrast, the US is getting more support from the UK, Australia and Canada.’
keep reading
February 7, 2021
' "Longer Telegram" | To Counter China’s Rise, the U.S. Should Focus on Xi'
A strategy that focuses more narrowly on Xi, rather than the CCP as a whole, presents a more achievable objective.'
keep reading
February 7, 2021
'The Sources of Soviet Conduct'
'The main element of any United States policy toward the Soviet Union must be that of a long-term, patient but firm and vigilant containment of Russian expansive tendencies.’
keep reading
June 24, 2021
'Hong Kong’s Apple Daily newspaper folds under government pressure'
Apple Daily was much more than a newspaper. To its fans, it was a defender of freedoms. To its foes, it was the defiler of national sovereignty.’
keep reading
June 24, 2021
The End of 'Apple Daily' - and Freedom of the Press in Hong Kong
Through arrests and freezing of assets, Beijing has forced the closing of Hong Kong’s last pro-democracy newspaper, the Apple Daily.
keep reading
June 20, 2021
‘Why do business and political leaders in the West persist in getting China so wrong?’
From that I suggested that to invest successfully in China, you have to understand – and be aware of - what those differences are.
keep reading
June 20, 2021
‘Why do business and political leaders in the West persist in getting China so wrong?
‘Why do business and political leaders in the West persist in getting China so wrong?’
keep reading
June 17, 2021
'Back-to-Back Rebukes of China Mark a Turning Point'
‘The one-two punch of public criticism smacks directly into Mr. Xi’s assertion that China won’t stand for lecturing by other nations, suggesting anxiety in key capitals is prompting governments to seek alignment with the U.S. over attempting to manage the relationship with Beijing on their own.’
keep reading
June 17, 2021
'Meet the New Chinese Economy, Same as the Old Chinese Economy'
If a recovery led by investment in real estate and industrial production, with consumption lagging behind, sounds familiar, it may be because the same could be said of the makeup of China’s growth before Covid-19.’
keep reading
June 17, 2021
Part 1 | 'Is China exporting inflation?'
‘Beijing is moving swiftly to protect its factories and workplaces from rising costs.’ ‘Still, rising prices in China, by far the world’s biggest manufacturer and exporter, could be felt around the world.’
keep reading
June 17, 2021
Bernie Sanders: 'Don’t Start a New Cold War With China'
‘The pendulum of conventional wisdom in Washington has now swung from being far too optimistic about the opportunities presented by unfettered trade with China to being far too hawkish about the threats posed by the richer, stronger, more authoritarian China that has been one result of that increased trade.’
keep reading
June 17, 2021
Part 2 | 'Is China exporting inflation?'
“Is China exporting inflation? In renminbi terms, it’s not so obvious. But in U.S. dollar terms, it starts to get more sizable.” ’
keep reading
June 13, 2021
'Forget about China': Clyde Prestowitz
Clyde Prestowitz has influenced U.S. foreign trade and investment policy for many decades, both inside and outside government.
keep reading
June 9, 2021
'Joe Biden Worries That China Might Win'
‘Biden worries that China is in competition for America, and not only that—they might win. This belief underpins the Biden doctrine.’
keep reading
June 9, 2021
'From the G7 to a D-10: Strengthening democratic cooperation for today's challenges'
‘A “Democratic-10” or “D-10” is aimed at rallying the world’s most powerful democracies around a common cause— advancing a rules-based democratic order based on shared values and common interests.’
keep reading
June 9, 2021
Biden Worries China Might Win
‘Biden has taken the vital first step of correctly diagnosing the strategic challenge facing the country.’ ‘Like Harry Truman at the start of the Cold War and George H. W. Bush at its end, the president now has an opportunity to create a framework for a new era.’
keep reading
June 9, 2021
Joe Biden: 'My trip to Europe is about America rallying the world’s democracies'
‘This is a defining question of our time: Can democracies come together to deliver real results for our people in a rapidly changing world?’
keep reading
June 9, 2021
'NATO & China's Challenges to Europe'
‘Even though China does not pose a direct military threat to NATO, contrary to Russia or terrorist groups, Beijing’s growing economic influence and diplomatic assertiveness in Europe coupled with its growing military relationship with Russia do have major implications for the transatlantic economy as well as its security.’
keep reading
June 3, 2021
5 | Two Caveats
‘Highlighting the strategic questionability of China’s policies doesn’t mean that Beijing’s fears of the outside world are completely unjustified.’
keep reading
June 3, 2021
1 | 'Wolf Warriors Killed China’s Grand Strategy—and We'll All Come to Miss It'
‘The predominant feature of Chinese conduct today is not grand strategy but a belligerent, defensive nationalism that lashes out without heed of consequences.’ Sometime in 2020, China came unmoored from its grand strategy.
keep reading
June 3, 2021
4 | Why China Abandoned Its Grand Strategy
‘The most persuasive explanation is that China has poisoned itself through its own rhetoric.’
keep reading
June 3, 2021
6 | The Risks & the Dangers
‘The real danger is that once toxin has spread through the system, there is no knowing where it will end.’
keep reading
June 3, 2021
2 | Blame It on Xi
‘In China’s case, the Xi era has seen the accumulation of somewhat counterproductive policies that catalyzed a breakdown.’
keep reading
June 3, 2021
3 | Enter the ‘Wolf Warriors’
‘What changed in 2020 was that nationalism for its own sake became the predominant motif of Chinese conduct.’
keep reading
June 3, 2021
Killing China's Grand Strategy
Trend: Under the Xi Jinping administration, China has amped up abrasive ‘Wolf Warrior’ diplomacy; cracked down within its borders, despite protests and criticisms from other countries; become increasing bellicose in responding to those protests and criticisms, and any other pushback it doesn’t like; and increased its aggressive rhetoric and actions against neighbors. Risks: If this sounds like a problem just for the world’s Ministries of Foreign Affairs, think again – the impact extends deep into business and finance.
keep reading
May 30, 2021
'Final Thoughts'
'Just as Brzezinski foresaw the two new contending blocs –– requiring greater “geostrategic skill” –– that are forming today, Kissinger has emphasized the unprecedented dangers that AI could introduce into a divided world.’
keep reading
May 30, 2021
China's ‘Anti-Hegemonist Bloc’
‘To counter U.S. coalition building, China has enhanced its diplomatic, economic, and military relationship with both Russia and Iran in recent months, resulting in the closest ties these countries have had in the post-Cold War era.’
keep reading
May 30, 2021
Postscript: China Doubts U.S. Allies Support
'Chinese leadership is also cynical about the effectiveness of a U.S.-led Cold War-style bloc.’
keep reading
May 30, 2021
Biden’s ‘Anti-China Bloc’
‘Throughout President Joe Biden’s first 100 days in office, his administration has largely continued the Trump administration’s hawkish approach toward China.’ ‘President Biden has also made international coalition building to confront the growing power and influence of China his primary foreign policy initiative.’ ‘Chinese leaders and the public are not convinced by the statements recently made by President Biden that these U.S.-led alliances are “not anti-Chinese” and that the United States is “not looking for confrontation” with China.’
keep reading
May 30, 2021
What China Thinks About Biden's China Policy
And that is what makes Cheng Li’s ‘Biden’s China strategy: Coalition-driven competition or Cold War-style confrontation?' so valuable. Cheng has decades of close relationships with China’s leaders and high officials. They trust him not to attribute their comments and so speak freely and honestly to him. Cheng is the person I rely on most to convey China’s positions.
keep reading
May 30, 2021
Worse for China than Trump
‘Many Chinese now believe that the Biden administration could be more detrimental to U.S.-China relations than the Trump administration.’
keep reading
May 30, 2021
'Biden’s China strategy: Coalition-driven competition or Cold War-style confrontation?'
‘Senior officials on the foreign policy team have frequently emphasized three “C” words: competition, cooperation, and confrontation.’
keep reading
May 30, 2021
The Trump Legacy
‘From Beijing’s perspective, the hawkish approach to China in the final year of the Trump administration revealed that the Trump team sought to defeat and destroy China in much the same way that the United States defeated the Soviet Union in the Cold War.’
keep reading
May 27, 2021
'China Bets on Productivity Over Population to Drive Its Economy'
‘Beijing has a two-pronged approach to maintaining economic growth as its population shrinks.’ ‘First, it intends to slow the decline of the urban workforce by raising the retirement age and encouraging migration of more of the country’s 510 million rural residents to cities.’ ‘Second, it plans to raise productivity -- a measure of economic output per worker -- with the latest five-year plan emphasizing better vocational education and more investment in scientific research, automation and digital infrastructure.’ [see second chart above]
keep reading
May 27, 2021
'Why Demographics is (Close to) Destiny'
‘Demographics may not be destiny, but for students of geopolitics, they come close.’
keep reading
May 27, 2021
'Lousy demographics will not stop China’s rise'
‘The old maxim ‘demography is destiny’ no longer holds in the same way that it used to.’ ‘A shrinking and ageing population may not have the same gloomy implications in the 21st century.’
keep reading
May 27, 2021
'Sex and the Chinese Economy'
‘A rise in China’s male-female ratio may have contributed to between one-third and one-half of the increase in its trade surplus with other countries.’ ‘The sex imbalance thus likely underpins an important source of tension between China and the US. Yet bilateral engagement has paid scant attention to this linkage.’
keep reading

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.