CHINAMacroReporter

Why SOE Reform is So Tough

'...SOEs need to reform, because on one hand, many of them have achieved a lot for China. On the other hand, they've actually created quite a lot of harm, in particular in the areas of overcapacity but also in the areas of corruption we've talked about.'
by

|

CHINADebate

February 15, 2017
Why SOE Reform is So Tough

Malcolm Riddell: Okay. Ed, we were talking earlier about SOE reform, state-ownedenterprise reform. I was wondering if you could tell me what's happening now with that.

Ed Tse: As you know, Malcolm, the SOE was somewhat of a double-edged sword for the Chinese government for a long time. The SOEs have helped theChinese government drive a lot of changes in China, because as you know the SOEs are directly owned by the Chinese government.Essentially, each enterprise can carry out the orders from the Chinese government. For a long time, they have actually in a way created a lot of progress for China.

At the same time, the SOEs also have developed a number of major problems, all related to the governance or the lack of proper governance of these enterprises.Malcolm Riddell: What do you mean?

Ed Tse: What I mean is, in a "modern" enterprise, the governance usually carried out through a properly designed board of directors. That board, as you know, provides the checks and balance for the management, and to make sure that things are done in a proper way.

For many SOEs, certainly in the old days, there's no such concept.There's no such concept of a public board of directors, because the SOEs were directly owned by the state, either at the central level or at the local government level. Therefore, a lot of the directors were given directly from the SASAC, which is the state organization which is the caretaker of all the state assets. They could directly or command directions for theSOEs through the chairman, or the so-called general manager, or the CEOof the companies. From a governance standpoint, it took a long time for the SOEs to build proper governance.

Malcolm Riddell: If I understand correctly, the SOEs are also pretty independent of government orders. They're not quite as lockstep with government directives as they might be. Is that right?

Ed Tse: It depends on the sectors that the SOEs are in. If they're in more opensectors, open meaning less regulated, more competition, and so on, theSOEs need to compete with the competitors, and the competitors usually come from either the private sector and/or the multinationals. For those companies, they need to be very agile and to be very market-oriented. By definition, they are less interfered with the government.

On the other hand, as you know, in some other sectors where perhaps it's much more protected, much more monopolized, and in some casesSOEs are in sectors that are considered as national security sectors. In those sectors, certainly there is quite a bit of alignment, in fact in some cases significant alignment, between the enterprise behavior and the government policies.

Malcolm Riddell: I can certainly see that with national security, but let me give you an example. The local government officials don't always listen to the directives from Beijing. They go their own way a lot of times. My understanding is that an awful lot of SOEs do the same thing.

Ed Tse: That's true at the local levels. Certainly very true. In fact, as you know,Malcolm, that is a good cause for much of the overcapacity that we see across many sectors in China, is because many of the locally owned and locally controlled SOEs are trying to do their own things, and therefore there's a lot of repeated investment.

Malcolm Riddell: One of my favorite directives I ever saw from the NDRC was about copper smelting. I forget in which county. It was a directive to shut down a couple of underperforming copper smelters. The directive said specifically, "You can't just shut them down and then move them to another place and open them up again." I thought that gave the idea.

I understand at the local, but at the national level, can we really say that the heads of a lot of these SOEs, the ones that fall in between, not the ones that are competing hard and not the ones that are obviously a matter of national security, but do the ones that are in between sometimes thumb their noses at the directions from the center?

Ed Tse: Yeah, as you know, there's always the check and balance. How do you actually create the balance? On the one hand, the enterprise executives from these SOEs need to deliver value, deliver themselves, because they're measured by SASAC on commercial performance. At the sametime, in many cases, the government would also like them to deliver missions or certain things that is perhaps not entirely conversant.

Let's take, for example, companies in the construction industry. Ofcourse, companies need to create value by doing construction projects on a profitable basis, but nonetheless, as you also know, in some cases some of these infrastructure construction projects can be at least partially motivated by national priorities, for example, building a high speed rail. Does it make sense economically?

If you analyze this from a pure project-based feasibility standpoint, a lot 3of the high-speed rail links are not economically feasible, yet the Chinese government, in particular the SOEs who are involved in this effort,continue to build, and China is still building. It has high-speed rail across the entire country because the Chinese government think that actually beyond some simple analysis of the economic feasibility, there's a multiplier effect on the economic ramifications of having an expansive network of high-speed across all of China and even perhaps beyondChina. That's a state-level or government initiative together with some economic analysis. That's how some of the SOEs needed help.

Malcolm Riddell: We needed the same thing. President Eisenhower created the national highway system for the same kind of multiplier effect. I'm talking about something a little bit different. What I'm saying is, when you talk about governance, and if we consider that if we take the premise that SOEs just follow the directions from whatever area of central government they report to, then how and why is governance a problem at all?

Ed Tse: Governance is critical because on one hand the executives need to have a clear check and balance on the decisions that they make. Some of that has to be with respect to whether or not a certain investment is justified and is to the benefit of the enterprises. That's one function of the board.

The other function of the board is to make sure that there is enough,what's the word, transparency in the decision-making, because you don't want to end up with inappropriate behavior, and therefore inappropriate benefits for individuals, in particular for the senior people in the company. As you know, Malcolm, some of the SOEs are now known as a hotbed for corruption for the senior people. That's why [inaudible00:13:59] corporate governance are coming.

Malcolm Riddell: This is the point I'm getting at. This is the contradiction that I see. If we start with the idea that SOEs are controlled by the government, then we would assume that that means the executives in there take orders from the government and act accordingly. I don't think that's the way it works.We see resistance. We see corruption. We see all kinds of activities that are going on there. How can you put a system of governance in place if you're still taking orders from the central government?

Ed Tse: Right. When I said the government, the SOEs taking their orders from the government meaning if the government wanted to direct an enterprise ora bunch of enterprises in a certain direction, in theory the executives from the SOEs would need to follow or should follow. Indeed, I would say most if not all of them do follow, but in the process of these executives doing their everyday decisions, and perhaps in some cases if they need to make a couple of investments or engage in a certain kind of project and so on, at least in the past, many of the executives would probably get 4their hands into the [inaudible 00:15:35] and perhaps try to benefit through much of the incoming investment. All things happens. Following the direction of the government, from a policy standpoint, that happens.At the same time, corruption also happens.

Malcolm Riddell: Let me take this from a different point of view. Quite often, the CEO of a major state-owned enterprise will do that for a few years, and switch out to a ministry post, and then maybe do some provincial post, and back toan SOE. Really we've got the same crowd managing the SOEs as are in the government. They're all in the same pool. Is that accurate?

Ed Tse: That's pretty accurate, you're right. In a way, the people in government and the people who lead the SOEs are from the same pool, in a way theelites in the Communist Party. These are people who considered as pretty capable and actually have a way to manage their career through the Communist Party. Essentially, it's more or less the same pool of people, but as you know, there are some 800,000 members of the Communist Party, so it's a pretty big pool.

Malcolm Riddell: I'm not disagreeing with that. What I'm trying to clarify for our viewers is that what we have here is a very different system, very different structure,than what we have say in the West, where you have an independent enterprise that, if it's a public company, has public stock holders. It has responsibilities to them. It has a board that is meant to make independent decisions based on the best interest of the companies and the shareholders. Executives are beholden to the board, and when one of them leaves, he probably goes on to be an executive in another company,whereas in the system in China, we have a very deep pool of people,perhaps, who take on various roles in their careers both in government and in industry. It's a very different system than what we're used to here,and I think it's one of the things that makes the governance question particularly hard to understand.

Ed Tse: It is certainly very different than the so-called Western system. That's why the SOEs need to reform, because on one hand, many of them have achieved a lot for China. On the other hand, they've actually created quite a lot of harm, in particular in the areas of overcapacity but also in the areas of corruption we've talked about.

More

CHINAMacroReporter

February 22, 2021
How American Free Trade Can Outdo China
‘When it comes to trade, a critical dimension of the U.S. and China competition, America is ceding the field. At the same time, China has expanded its trade footprint. When it comes to trade and investment agreements, China isn’t isolated. The U.S. increasingly is. Now we have to make up for lost ground. America can out-compete China, but first it needs to get back in the game.’
keep reading
February 21, 2021
China’s ‘two sessions’: why this year’s event is so important for Xi Jinping’s vision for the future
‘The ‘Two Sessions,’ the annual meeting of the National People’s Congress, the country’s legislature, and the top political advisory body, the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, begins on March 5 and runs for about two weeks.’
keep reading
February 20, 2021
‘The Future of China’s Past: Rising China’s Next Act'
‘By the Party’s own acknowledgment, Deng’s initial arrangement has run its course. It is therefore time to develop a new understanding that will do for the Party in the next 30 years what Deng’s program did in the previous era.'
keep reading
January 31, 2021
'Ted Cruz, Chinese Communist Party Agree: Keep Hongkongers Trapped in China'
‘The bill Cruz blocked, the Hong Kong People's Freedom and Choice Act of 2020, would grant political asylum to any resident of Hong Kong who arrives in the United States, allowing them to remain in the country legally after the expiration of any other visa.'
keep reading
January 31, 2021
Analysis: China tests Biden on Taiwan, with eye on another island
‘And it is at Pratas Island where a behind-the-scenes tug-of-war is being played out between the U.S. and China.’
keep reading
January 31, 2021
'Top Conflicts to Watch in 2021: The Danger of U.S.-China Confrontation Over Taiwan'
‘While people appear to believe that the Biden administration will strive to avoid acute crisis with China over Taiwan, U.S. policy toward Taiwan only reflects half of the story. The other, and more important half is from China.’
keep reading
January 31, 2021
China Tests Biden
In today’s issue: 1. China Tests Biden Over Taiwan / 2. The UK Stands Up, the U.S. Not So Much / 3. Why Impeding U.S.-China Capital Flows Isn't Easy
keep reading
January 27, 2021
Xi Jinping: 'Why We All Just Get Along?'
In today’s issue:1. Biden Shows his Hand on China / 2. Xi Shows his Hand on the U.S./ 3. Multi-Lateralism, Chinese-Style / 4. Cooperation or 'Strategic Competition'?
keep reading
January 27, 2021
'Xi Jinping Wows Them at Davos'
‘The test for the Biden team is whether it will be tripped up by the feints toward international norms and comity that punctuate Mr. Xi’s pattern of regional aggression.’
keep reading
January 27, 2021
Part One | 'Biden’s Opening Salvo on Beijing'
‘The Biden administration is less than a week old, but its most consequential foreign-policy decisions may already be behind it.’
keep reading
January 27, 2021
'China’s Xi Champions Multilateralism at Davos, Again'
‘While Xi’s speech may have echoed similar themes from his 2017 address, today’s circumstances are markedly different.’
keep reading
January 27, 2021
'China’s Xi Warns Against Confrontation in Veiled Message to Biden'
‘Chinese President Xi Jinping issued a veiled warning against the new Biden administration’s preparations to rally allies to challenge Beijing on a range of issues.’
keep reading
January 27, 2021
'China rejects 'strategic competition' and calls on US to cooperate'
‘China wants cooperation, not strategic competition, the Foreign Ministry said Tuesday, a day after the White House said it was looking to form a "new approach" toward China.’
keep reading
January 27, 2021
'Xi Jinping at the Virtual Davos: Multilateralism with Chinese characteristics'
‘At the virtual Davos this week, Xi essentially proposed a multilateralism with Chinese characteristics—designed to ensure that international interactions be conducted in accordance with China’s perspectives.’
keep reading
January 27, 2021
Part Two | 'Biden’s Opening Salvo on Beijing'
‘China will think carefully before making its next moves, but it’s unlikely to submit tamely to American pressure.’
keep reading
January 23, 2021
‘Reasons for Increases In Cross-Border Capital Flows into China’
'Cross-border portfolio capital flows into China have been rising since 2014.'
keep reading
January 23, 2021
'Rethinking 2020: What’s Overlooked and What’s Overhyped'
‘If a single word were chosen to define US-China in 2020, “decoupling” would be a good candidate. What has been overlookedis just how little meaningful decoupling actually happened.’
keep reading
January 23, 2021
'A Complex Inheritance: Transitioning to a New Approach on China'
‘For the Biden administration to successfully transition to a new and more effective China strategy, the various existing Trump measures should not be treated in the same way.’
keep reading
January 23, 2021
‘China’s Easing of Regulations Restricting Foreign Ownership of Financial Firms’
'Foreign firms have only a tiny slice of most segments of this market; they control less than 2 percent of banking assets, for example, and less than 6 percent of the insurance market.'
keep reading
January 23, 2021
'Does Xi Jinping Face a Coup Threat?'
In today’s issue: 1. Rest easy. Xi is Safe / 2. China a Career Killer? /3. Rethinking 2020: What’s Overlooked and What’s Overhyped / 4. China’s Financial Opening Accelerates
keep reading
January 23, 2021
The struggle over chips enters a new phase
In the 20th century the world’s biggest economic choke-point involved oil being shipped through the Strait of Hormuz. Soon it will be silicon etched in a few technology parks in South Korea and Taiwan.’
keep reading
January 23, 2021
'Why Chinese Companies are Having a Tough Time Recruiting in the U.S.'
‘I have seen senior executives who take on very public roles within some of these Chinese companies find that their life after those companies has been more limited. It even has a bit of a taint. A bit like working for tobacco.’
keep reading
January 23, 2021
H.R. McMaster: 'Biden would do the world a favor by keeping Trump’s China policy'
‘No doubt the Biden administration will see ways to improve the strategic framework we devised, but continuity with the approach is essential.’
keep reading
January 23, 2021
'Does Xi Jinping Face a Coup Threat?'
‘So if you're an autocrat, you really have to be nervous about what's the military doing and is the military coming after me?’
keep reading
January 23, 2021
‘China’s Financial Opening Accelerates’
‘Despite predictions by some observers that the United States and China are headed for a “decoupling,” China’s integration into global financial markets is accelerating.’
keep reading
January 22, 2021
Confronting the Challenge of Chinese State Capitalism
‘When a U.S. or European firms compete against, say, COSCO Shipping or Huawei, it is the entirety of the Chinese government’s balance sheet that it must contend with, not just an individual firm.’
keep reading
January 20, 2021
'When it comes to China, Team Biden sounds a lot like Team Trump'
‘As Biden has announced his picks for cabinet positions and senior policy advisers, it has been almost impossible to distinguish his new team's China rhetoric from that of the departing Trump officials.’
keep reading
January 20, 2021
'When it comes to China, Team Biden sounds a lot like Team Trump'
In today’s issue: 1. Biden's China Hawks / 2. Keep Trump's China Policy [?] / 3. Breaking Down Biden's China Challenges
keep reading
January 16, 2021
'Jack Ma Misreads Xi Jinping'
"The reason why Jack Ma and others could build enormous Internet companies is because the Party had no idea what they were doing. They became famous globally and made China look very good, but then the Party had to figure out how to get their arms around them."
keep reading
January 16, 2021
'China: Taming the Overshoot'
‘We expect GDP growth to improve to 7.1% in 2021 from 2.2% in 2020.Realized growth will likely overshoot potential growth in 2021, but from a policy perspective, we expect that the authorities would prefer to avoid an aggressive overshoot in one particular year in exchange for a smoother and more sustainable growth profile over the next five years.’
keep reading
January 16, 2021
'Financial Technology Is China’s Trojan Horse'
‘Chinese fintech firms function like a geoeconomic Trojan horse.’
keep reading
January 16, 2021
'Where in the World is Jack Ma?'
In today’s issue: 1. Where in the World is Jack Ma?'The CCP's Ambivalence about the Private Sector’‘Jack Ma Misreads Xi Jinping’ / 2. China’s Fintech Threat‘Financial Technology Is China’s Trojan Horse’ / 3. 2021 Economic Outlook: Sunrise in a Fractured World’ | CHINA
keep reading
January 13, 2021
'Kurt Campbell, Biden’s pick for a new NSC Asia position, should reassure nervous allies'
‘Asia watchers in Washington and America’s Asian allies should be reassured that Biden is planning to elevate the importance of the Indo-Pacific region by creating this coordinator role and staffing it with someone so senior.'
keep reading
January 13, 2021
1. 'Restoring Balance'
‘China’s growing material power has indeed destabilized the region’s delicate balance and emboldened Beijing’s territorial adventurism. Left unchecked, Chinese behavior could end the region’s long peace.’
keep reading
January 13, 2021
3. 'Forging Coalitions'
‘The principal challenge facing the United States is to bridge European and regional approaches to Chinese challenges.’
keep reading
January 13, 2021
'How America Can Shore Up Asian Order'
‘This combination of Chinese assertiveness and U.S. ambivalence has left the Indo-Pacific region in flux.'
keep reading
January 13, 2021
2. 'Restoring Legitimacy'
‘Negotiating Beijing’s role in this order is the most complex element of the overall endeavor.’
keep reading

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.