CHINAMacroReporter

The father of business consulting in China knows why eBay failed there

In the early 1990s, when China was still struggling to shrug off the straightjacket of its planned economy, the man appointed to lead the first business consulting firm allowed in the nation was immediately confronted with the scope of the challenge ahead.
by

|

CHINADebate

September 1, 2017
The father of business consulting in China knows why eBay failed there

By Joseph Catanzaro, INTHEBLACK

In the early 1990s, when China was still struggling to shrug off the straightjacket of its planned economy, the man appointed to lead the first business consulting firm allowed in the nation was immediately confronted with the scope of the challenge ahead. 

“There wasn’t even a concept of what a company was,” says Dr Edward Tse. “Everything was a state-owned enterprise (SOE), and a SOE is very different from a company like we know them today.”

Tse, raised in Hong Kong and educated both there and in the US, was poached from McKinsey & Company by Boston Consulting Group (BCG) in 1993. BCG was the first business consulting firm given approval by the Chinese Government to set up shop in mainland China.

The nation was beginning to open up to the world under economic reforms, and BCG saw potential in both China and Tse. It has proven to be a wise choice. Tse is held in high esteem in China: he’s the man everyone wants to know and he’s regarded as one of the best management consultants in the business. 

Made managing partner of BCG’s China practice, Tse says his initial work with China’s fledgling business community wasn’t just about convincing potential clients that his people could do a good job, but being good at convincing them what they did actually constituted a job. 

“People asked, ‘what do you guys actually do?’. We’d say, ‘well, we manage a consulting firm to advise companies’. They’d shake their heads. They couldn’t understand what a consulting firm was.”

Fast-forward two decades, and both China and its consulting industry are vastly changed. In 2016, foreign direct investment in China grew by 4.1 per cent year-on-year to US$118 billion, reports China’s Ministry of Commerce. China’s consulting sector, which is helping guide those foreign companies and local businesses, was valued at about US$3 billion in 2015 by UK-based Source Information Services. In early 2017, IBISWorld put the sector’s worth at US$25 billion. 

China business pioneer

Sitting on a high-speed train traveling at hundreds of kilometers per hour through what is now the world’s second biggest economy, Tse says he believed early on that the potential rewards of doing business in China would far outweigh the challenges. He waves away the suggestion he is the founding father of China’s now booming consulting sector, despite his role as the first to steer a practice through those uncharted waters. Instead, he puts his appointment down to “right place and right time”.

“At that time there weren’t many ethnic Chinese strategy consultants and so demand and supply made it happen,” he says. 

Others believe Tse is just being humble. 

“Edward Tse must be considered a pioneer in the field of business consulting in China,” says Shane Tedjarati, a former client and now president of Global High Growth Regions for Honeywell. “I’ve known Dr Tse for over two decades and he’s provided invaluable advice on numerous industries, including automotive and high technology.”

All Tse will admit is he was busy from the get-go. In the early 1990s, foreign firms suddenly had access to the most populous nation on the planet. 

“We [BCG] received a frenzy of inquiries and projects, right away,” Tse says. 

In the past 20 years, he has continued to advise companies on how best to enter the China market, initially at BCG, and later as Booz & Company’s senior partner and chairman for Greater China. 

Along the way he’s written award-winning books on China business strategy and management (The China Strategy in 2010 and China’s Disruptors in 2015), had board appointments on Chinese state-owned giants including Baoshan Iron & Steel, and been given government advisory roles in Hong Kong and Shanghai. 

He’s also earned himself a reputation in business circles as a China whisperer. Tse is tight-lipped about his client list, but it’s understood it includes some of the biggest names in global business, across a wide range of sectors. 

The China market evolution continues

Tse, however, is not one to rest on his laurels. He says, in China, it isn’t an option. “The China market is still evolving. The China market we knew 20 years ago is different to the market 10 years ago, and the China market today. It’s a moving target.” 

There are some big factors behind China’s ever-changing business landscape, Tse explains. Foremost is that China’s transition to a totally free market economy won’t be completed for another few decades, meaning the business landscape will continue to shift as protectionist legislation is scaled back and SOE monopolies are challenged.  

That’s one reason why Tse has continued his own evolution. Just before Booz & Company merged with PwC in 2014 (becoming Strategy&), Tse struck out on his own to found the Gao Feng Advisory Company, which is firmly rooted in China.  

After decades of telling foreign companies their China business needed to be more China-centric, Tse took his own advice. 

“China was always at the fringe, not the core, for the big multinational companies,” he says, “and that also applied to the big consulting companies, because they were headquartered in the West.”

“People asked, ‘what do you guys actually do?’… They couldn’t understand what a consulting firm was.”

Tse’s Gao Feng practice is at the front of a new wave of Chinese consulting firms that are beginning to compete with the multinational players in China. With about 100 consultants spread across Beijing, Shanghai and Hong Kong, it is still a small practice, but Tse says Gao Feng is punching above its weight and is now often “invited to compete with the big firms”. 

His first suggestion for businesses looking to break into China is not to arrogantly assume that the one-size-fits-all approach successfully used in 100 other markets will work there. This isn’t a revelation, because he’s been saying it for 20 years; the surprise is that many foreign business leaders still think their company is the exception, and does not have to adapt. 

“China’s transition from a planned economy is still going on and in my opinion it will take another few decades to complete that transition,” he says. “This is unique. I don’t know another country in the world doing this. 

“You have got a much more complex [business] ecosystem in China. The players are not just pure commercial players: you have private companies and multinationals, but you have also got SOEs who play a different ball game … the government is also very involved in driving the economy.”

Secrets of success and failure

Underestimating just how different China is, and where problems and competition may arise, has been the death knell of more than one bid to enter the China market, says Tse. This pitfall can be avoided, he adds, but it involves giving up something global head offices rarely like to relinquish: control. 

“You have to put the brainpower for the real decision-making here in China,” says Tse. 

Dr Edward Tse

Dr Edward Tse, He points to eBay’s unsuccessful 2002 bid to make it in China. The internet giant ran up the white flag after being beaten by a then much smaller home-grown company, Alibaba. It’s what can happen when a multinational doesn’t give its China office enough autonomy, says Tse. 

“eBay didn’t understand the complexities of the China market. They required everything to be done almost exactly as they they did it in the US,” he says. 

“Alibaba was smaller but its team was flexible and adapted quickly. They understood what the consumer wanted and they developed a locally accepted version of the business model. 

“If it would take a week before eBay [with its head office overseas] could make a decision and come back to China with it, during that one week Alibaba could have made five decisions. This is how Alibaba beat eBay.” 

Implementing a Western, “democratic and by consensus” management style has also often proven a mistake, adds Tse. Most of the successful companies in China, both domestic and foreign, are led by a particular brand of executive that resonates with the local Chinese workforce. 

“The … leaders who are successful at multinationals are usually in a control mode,” he says. “They tend to be viewed as the big boss, someone with authority who has a lot of decision-making power and is able to drive the business in a very local way despite what headquarters wants them to do. They are really quite good at saying this is what we do, we have vision, we have purpose, and the team will then follow.”

The Chinese consumer

The other, obvious side of the success equation is the reception from Chinese consumers. 

Tse says too many multinationals come in with a view that their core product will simply work in China, as is. Yet with little or no brand recognition to rely on, foreign products are often less appealing to consumers than local alternatives. 

Tse points to Coke as a company that did a reasonable job of adapting its product presentation to appeal to Chinese consumers and diversified its product line to capture more market share. 

“They genuinely tried to create a more locally accepted product line. At the same time, while they are trying to develop local products such as juices and Chinese tea, I think they’re still hanging too much on their core carbonated drinks.”

The biggest challenge facing businesses coming into China now, however, is digital disruption.  

Chinese consumers are accustomed to using digital payment systems, expect to be able to order almost every product online on established platforms, and have these products delivered to their door – often in less than 24 hours, says Tse. 

China’s level of technology acceptance and integration is unparalleled anywhere in the world outside of Silicon Valley. 

“If you’re headquartered outside of China, you don’t get a sense of the rapid digital disruption in China,” Tse says. “The local guys based in China know, and I’m sure they inform headquarters, but they don’t get it. They hear the words internet, mobile, digital payment, P2P (peer-to-peer); they hear the terms but don’t understand deeply the change in China.”

For those thinking they can play catch up or feel their way into the market, the first man in China’s consulting sector offers a last piece of advice: “The Chinese consumer won’t wait.” 

More

CHINAMacroReporter

February 23, 2021
HSBC offers lesson in corporate realpolitik
‘HSBC’s Asia pivot is a lesson in corporate realpolitik. It is just as much a recognition of the new political reality facing every western company that is dependent on doing business with China. Businesses will have to choose between western markets and access to China, and between liberal and authoritarian value systems.’
keep reading
February 23, 2021
Germany Is a Flashpoint in the U.S.-China Cold War
'As goes Germany, so goes Europe — and that’s a real challenge for the U.S. Berlin leads a European bloc that could cast a geopolitical swing vote in the U.S.-China rivalry.’
keep reading
February 22, 2021
Remaking “Made in China”: Beijing’s Industrial Internet Ambitions
‘The Chinese government is placing large bureaucratic and financial bets on upgrading and digitizing its already dominant manufacturing base. Such efforts have coalesced around one key term: the “industrial internet” (工业互联网). The successful application of it across Chinese industry would prolong and elevate the “Made in China” era.’
keep reading
January 13, 2021
Kurt Campbell & Biden Asia Policy
In today’s issue: 1. Kurt Campbell: Biden's 'Indo-Pacific Coordinator' / 2. 'How America Can Shore Up Asian Order' by Kurt Campbell
keep reading
January 9, 2021
'Matt Pottinger resigns, but his China strategy is here to stay'
‘Even though Pottinger’s name was largely unknown to the public, his influence on U.S. foreign policy will be felt for years to come.’
keep reading
January 9, 2021
'The Relevant Organs' Pro Tip: 'You Definitely Need a Show Trial'
Spitballing here, GOP friends, but Josh Hawley, Ted Cruz, Ron Johnson and Marjorie Taylor-Greene would make an excellent Gang of Four, if you need a show trial.
keep reading
January 9, 2021
How the Chinese reacted to the incident at the Capitol
In this issue: 1. China Reacts / ‘On Double Standards’ - 'Chinese netizens jeer riot in US Capitol as "Karma," say bubbles of "democracy and freedom" have burst' - 'A Few Tweets from Hu Xijin 胡锡进, Editor of The Global Times' / 2. ‘Architect of Trump China Policy Resigns’ - 'Matt Pottinger resigns, but his China strategy is here to stay' / 3. A Pro Tip from 'The Relevant Organs' - 'Dealing with Insurrectionist Leaders the Chinese Way'
keep reading
January 9, 2021
'On Double Standards'
‘Besides, facts are there, beyond anyone's denial, regardless of whether they came up in the Chinese media reports or not.’
keep reading
January 6, 2021
'Mo money, Ma problems - Chinese trustbusters’ pursuit of Alibaba is only the start'
'Chinese trustbusters long resisted hobbling an industry seen as world-beating, and backed in Beijing. Now, as in the West, they fret that a few giants control indispensable services—e-commerce, logistics, payments, ride-hailing, food delivery, social media, messaging.’
keep reading
January 6, 2021
'Mo Money, Ma Problems'
In today’s issue: 1. Eurasia Group| ‘Top Risks of 2021’ / 2. Biden & the EU-China Investment Agreement / 3. The EU-China Investment Agreement: Pro & Con / 4. China's Antitrust Investigation into AliBaba
keep reading
January 6, 2021
PRO | 'The Importance of the EU, China Investment Deal'
‘But we should not have waited for the Biden administration to sort things out. Wait for what? We don't know if China will be more responsive if the three parties sit together. We don't have a timeline. Shall we wait another two or three years?’
keep reading
January 6, 2021
'China and E.U. Leaders Strike Investment Deal, but Political Hurdles Await'
‘China appeared eager to reach an agreement before Mr. Biden takes office in January, calculating that closer economic ties with the Europeans could forestall efforts by the new administration to come up with an allied strategy for challenging China’s trade practices and other policies.’
keep reading
January 6, 2021
'China’s Pro-Monopoly Antitrust Crusade'
‘But Chinese regulators are unlikely to stop at Alibaba; China’s entire private sector has a target on its back.’
keep reading
January 6, 2021
‘Top Risks of 2021’: CHINA
'Overall, this year will experience an expansion of a high level of US-China tensions.'
keep reading
January 6, 2021
CON | 'Europe has handed China a strategic victory'
“We’ve allowed China to drive a huge wedge between the US and Europe.”
keep reading
January 6, 2021
'With Concessions and Deals, China’s Leader Tries to Box Out Biden'
‘Mr. Biden has pledged to galvanize a coalition to confront the economic, diplomatic and military challenges that China poses. China clearly foresaw the potential threat.’
keep reading
January 5, 2021
'Sansha City in China's South China Sea Strategy: Building a System of Administrative Control'
‘Sansha City, headquartered on Woody Island in the Paracel Islands, has created a system of party-state institutions that have normalized administrative control in the South China Sea. This system ultimately allows China to govern contested areas of the South China Sea as if they were Chinese territory.’
keep reading
January 1, 2021
Competition With China Could Be Short and Sharp
‘The bad news is that over the next five to ten years, the pace of Sino-American rivalry will be torrid, and the prospect of war frighteningly real, as Beijing becomes tempted to lunge for geopolitical gain.’ / ‘Historically, the most desperate dashes have come from powers that had been on the ascent but grew worried that their time was running short.’
keep reading
October 7, 2020
'Rivers of Iron': Changing the Face of Asia
‘But what's happened now is that Southeast Asia is rich enough to contemplate such infrastructure and that the Chinese have the technology, money, and high-speed rail industry so that they can both finance or help finance and build it.’
keep reading
August 27, 2020
Why China's Economy is Growing Faster than Others
‘First is China's relatively aggressive and decisive measures on the COVID public health crisis itself that managed to get the pandemic under control much faster than the other large economies.’ ‘The relative success in controlling the pandemic translates into how much people are willing to go back to their normal lives, to their jobs, and the like.’
keep reading
May 20, 2020
The Chinese Communist Party Fears Ending Up Like the Soviet Union
‘The propaganda ministry - within four to six weeks - managed to turn China into a problem for Europeans. China’s standing in Europe is eroding by the day.'
keep reading
May 13, 2020
The Party is Infallible
'The Hong Kong demonstrations can never be because of policy mistakes by the Communist Party itself.’ During our interview, Tony Saich of the Harvard Kennedy School told me: ‘Hong Kong, with its responses to the demonstrations, and the Coronavirus are both illustrative examples of how the culture of the Communist Party and the traditions it's built up over almost a hundred years reflect the way it behaves when it's confronted by certain crises.’
keep reading
May 6, 2020
The Phase One Trade Deal
‘The good news is that 80% of our members said they thought the Phase One agreement was a good thing.' 'But only 19% said it was worth it.' 'What the 80% said they are happy about was that there no more new tariffs were coming immediately.’
keep reading
May 2, 2020
South China Sea & Taiwan
'It would not be accurate to say China claims the entire South China Sea as its sovereign territory because the Chinese are unclear about what exactly their claim is and what it is based on.'
keep reading
April 29, 2020
Why Inflation Should Not Be A Problem
‘This is a crisis where the first chair is held by the public health officials, and the second chair is held by the fiscal authorities. We at the Fed have the freedom to be able to move relatively quickly, but we're the third chair here, trying to help out where we can.’
keep reading
April 25, 2020
China, America, & the 'Jaws Syndrome'
‘Both Trump and Xi have a fundamental political divide problem that the COVID-19 epidemic has exposed and made more apparent – and made substantially worse.’
keep reading
April 22, 2020
Why We Need Stronger Global Institutions
‘The trade war was actually about the dissemination of knowledge, knowledge transfer, technological transfer.’ ‘A great irony. We need global institutions or arrangements to deal with trade, technology, and health because individuals, corporations, and national governments cannot.’
keep reading
April 18, 2020
The Pandemic's Impact on Trade
‘There are some people who would say that there was already a retreat from globalization underway.’ ‘The tools of globalization - enormous reductions in the cost of transportation and communication - remain.’ ‘But the marginal utility actually of further advances is declining – that would be one way to put it.’
keep reading
April 11, 2020
The Pandemic May Increase China's Economic Strength vis-à-vis the U.S.
‘Well, I think people around the world are rightly suspicious of the Chinese as they are probably equally suspicious of the Americans.'
keep reading
April 30, 2018
'Big lessons from the faulty analysis that spiked the Shanghai stock market'
ProTips from Andrew Polk, Trivium China On April 24, equity analysts interpreted a phrase used in a Politburo meeting readout to signal a new round of economic stimulus. And, the Shanghai stock market, one of the world's worst performers, spiked 2%. On April 25, having much earlier advised and protected clients, Andrew Polk of Trivium China published an analysis in Trivium's daily (and free) Later, Andrew and I talked about how he reached his conclusions. His explanation is a masterclass in how experience, discipline, and some tedious slogging, combined with a sound analytical framework, lead to good China analysis.
keep reading
April 18, 2018
New super-agency, National Supervision Commission—and China's massive government restructuring
'With government restructuring, the biggest thing is the creation of an entirely new branch of government: the National Supervisory Commission. Its entire job is to overlook every single public official in China. It is an institutionalization and deepening of the corruption crackdown that we've seen over the past few years.'In all, Andrew highlighted four major actions from the Two Sessions: 1.Chinese government restructuring 2.The policy roadmap 3.Personnel 4.The legislative agenda + the constitutional amendments
keep reading
April 16, 2018
The Chinese Government’s 9 Economic Policy Priorities in 2018 (and beyond)
[China Econ Observer] 1.Supply-side Structural Reform 2.Innovation 3.The “three critical battles” 4.Deepening reforms 5.Rural revitalization 6.The regional development strategy 7.Increasing consumption and improving investment 8.Opening up 9.People’s wellbeing
keep reading
April 10, 2018
U.S.-China trade dispute: Will China Weaponize the RMB and U.S. Treasury bonds?
U.S.-China trade war: collateral damageConsider the soy bean. 'China is threatened retaliatory tariffs on U.S. soybeans. The U.S. is one of the largest producers of soybeans. If China's not going to buy them, we're going to have an excess capacity.'' So, last week, we saw a soybean selloff.''But there was a complete dislocation in whole soybean supply chains. Downstream products, like soybean oil, didn't move at all in the same way.'
keep reading
April 5, 2018
Behind the U.S.-China trade dispute: 'The West's China gamble has failed.'
What's the root cause of the current friction between the U.S. and China? The West's disappointment that China did follow the western model but its own, argues Ed Tse, CEO of Gao Feng Advisory Company (a member of the China Analyst Network). [Ed's solution] look to the similarities between China and the West, especially in the tech sector, and be alert to China's evolution toward better IPR, market access, and other contentious issues, not just the remaining shortcomings. Below is a video of my discussion with Ed and excerpts from both the interview and his South China Morning Post op-ed, 'Chinese innovation with US characteristics? Maybe China and the West aren’t that far apart, in business at least.' Ed presents insights that differ greatly from the China Echo Chamber in the U.S. Let me know what you think.
keep reading
March 8, 2018
How Trump's tariffs impact China's trade/currency relations with Japan & Korea
[China markets update with TRACK's Bob Savage] 'The currency markets are embroiled in trying to figure out whether the Trump tariffs on steel and aluminum are good or bad for the U.S. economy and the U.S. stock market.'
keep reading

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.