CHINAMacroReporter

The father of business consulting in China knows why eBay failed there

In the early 1990s, when China was still struggling to shrug off the straightjacket of its planned economy, the man appointed to lead the first business consulting firm allowed in the nation was immediately confronted with the scope of the challenge ahead.
by

|

CHINADebate

September 1, 2017
The father of business consulting in China knows why eBay failed there

By Joseph Catanzaro, INTHEBLACK

In the early 1990s, when China was still struggling to shrug off the straightjacket of its planned economy, the man appointed to lead the first business consulting firm allowed in the nation was immediately confronted with the scope of the challenge ahead. 

“There wasn’t even a concept of what a company was,” says Dr Edward Tse. “Everything was a state-owned enterprise (SOE), and a SOE is very different from a company like we know them today.”

Tse, raised in Hong Kong and educated both there and in the US, was poached from McKinsey & Company by Boston Consulting Group (BCG) in 1993. BCG was the first business consulting firm given approval by the Chinese Government to set up shop in mainland China.

The nation was beginning to open up to the world under economic reforms, and BCG saw potential in both China and Tse. It has proven to be a wise choice. Tse is held in high esteem in China: he’s the man everyone wants to know and he’s regarded as one of the best management consultants in the business. 

Made managing partner of BCG’s China practice, Tse says his initial work with China’s fledgling business community wasn’t just about convincing potential clients that his people could do a good job, but being good at convincing them what they did actually constituted a job. 

“People asked, ‘what do you guys actually do?’. We’d say, ‘well, we manage a consulting firm to advise companies’. They’d shake their heads. They couldn’t understand what a consulting firm was.”

Fast-forward two decades, and both China and its consulting industry are vastly changed. In 2016, foreign direct investment in China grew by 4.1 per cent year-on-year to US$118 billion, reports China’s Ministry of Commerce. China’s consulting sector, which is helping guide those foreign companies and local businesses, was valued at about US$3 billion in 2015 by UK-based Source Information Services. In early 2017, IBISWorld put the sector’s worth at US$25 billion. 

China business pioneer

Sitting on a high-speed train traveling at hundreds of kilometers per hour through what is now the world’s second biggest economy, Tse says he believed early on that the potential rewards of doing business in China would far outweigh the challenges. He waves away the suggestion he is the founding father of China’s now booming consulting sector, despite his role as the first to steer a practice through those uncharted waters. Instead, he puts his appointment down to “right place and right time”.

“At that time there weren’t many ethnic Chinese strategy consultants and so demand and supply made it happen,” he says. 

Others believe Tse is just being humble. 

“Edward Tse must be considered a pioneer in the field of business consulting in China,” says Shane Tedjarati, a former client and now president of Global High Growth Regions for Honeywell. “I’ve known Dr Tse for over two decades and he’s provided invaluable advice on numerous industries, including automotive and high technology.”

All Tse will admit is he was busy from the get-go. In the early 1990s, foreign firms suddenly had access to the most populous nation on the planet. 

“We [BCG] received a frenzy of inquiries and projects, right away,” Tse says. 

In the past 20 years, he has continued to advise companies on how best to enter the China market, initially at BCG, and later as Booz & Company’s senior partner and chairman for Greater China. 

Along the way he’s written award-winning books on China business strategy and management (The China Strategy in 2010 and China’s Disruptors in 2015), had board appointments on Chinese state-owned giants including Baoshan Iron & Steel, and been given government advisory roles in Hong Kong and Shanghai. 

He’s also earned himself a reputation in business circles as a China whisperer. Tse is tight-lipped about his client list, but it’s understood it includes some of the biggest names in global business, across a wide range of sectors. 

The China market evolution continues

Tse, however, is not one to rest on his laurels. He says, in China, it isn’t an option. “The China market is still evolving. The China market we knew 20 years ago is different to the market 10 years ago, and the China market today. It’s a moving target.” 

There are some big factors behind China’s ever-changing business landscape, Tse explains. Foremost is that China’s transition to a totally free market economy won’t be completed for another few decades, meaning the business landscape will continue to shift as protectionist legislation is scaled back and SOE monopolies are challenged.  

That’s one reason why Tse has continued his own evolution. Just before Booz & Company merged with PwC in 2014 (becoming Strategy&), Tse struck out on his own to found the Gao Feng Advisory Company, which is firmly rooted in China.  

After decades of telling foreign companies their China business needed to be more China-centric, Tse took his own advice. 

“China was always at the fringe, not the core, for the big multinational companies,” he says, “and that also applied to the big consulting companies, because they were headquartered in the West.”

“People asked, ‘what do you guys actually do?’… They couldn’t understand what a consulting firm was.”

Tse’s Gao Feng practice is at the front of a new wave of Chinese consulting firms that are beginning to compete with the multinational players in China. With about 100 consultants spread across Beijing, Shanghai and Hong Kong, it is still a small practice, but Tse says Gao Feng is punching above its weight and is now often “invited to compete with the big firms”. 

His first suggestion for businesses looking to break into China is not to arrogantly assume that the one-size-fits-all approach successfully used in 100 other markets will work there. This isn’t a revelation, because he’s been saying it for 20 years; the surprise is that many foreign business leaders still think their company is the exception, and does not have to adapt. 

“China’s transition from a planned economy is still going on and in my opinion it will take another few decades to complete that transition,” he says. “This is unique. I don’t know another country in the world doing this. 

“You have got a much more complex [business] ecosystem in China. The players are not just pure commercial players: you have private companies and multinationals, but you have also got SOEs who play a different ball game … the government is also very involved in driving the economy.”

Secrets of success and failure

Underestimating just how different China is, and where problems and competition may arise, has been the death knell of more than one bid to enter the China market, says Tse. This pitfall can be avoided, he adds, but it involves giving up something global head offices rarely like to relinquish: control. 

“You have to put the brainpower for the real decision-making here in China,” says Tse. 

Dr Edward Tse

Dr Edward Tse, He points to eBay’s unsuccessful 2002 bid to make it in China. The internet giant ran up the white flag after being beaten by a then much smaller home-grown company, Alibaba. It’s what can happen when a multinational doesn’t give its China office enough autonomy, says Tse. 

“eBay didn’t understand the complexities of the China market. They required everything to be done almost exactly as they they did it in the US,” he says. 

“Alibaba was smaller but its team was flexible and adapted quickly. They understood what the consumer wanted and they developed a locally accepted version of the business model. 

“If it would take a week before eBay [with its head office overseas] could make a decision and come back to China with it, during that one week Alibaba could have made five decisions. This is how Alibaba beat eBay.” 

Implementing a Western, “democratic and by consensus” management style has also often proven a mistake, adds Tse. Most of the successful companies in China, both domestic and foreign, are led by a particular brand of executive that resonates with the local Chinese workforce. 

“The … leaders who are successful at multinationals are usually in a control mode,” he says. “They tend to be viewed as the big boss, someone with authority who has a lot of decision-making power and is able to drive the business in a very local way despite what headquarters wants them to do. They are really quite good at saying this is what we do, we have vision, we have purpose, and the team will then follow.”

The Chinese consumer

The other, obvious side of the success equation is the reception from Chinese consumers. 

Tse says too many multinationals come in with a view that their core product will simply work in China, as is. Yet with little or no brand recognition to rely on, foreign products are often less appealing to consumers than local alternatives. 

Tse points to Coke as a company that did a reasonable job of adapting its product presentation to appeal to Chinese consumers and diversified its product line to capture more market share. 

“They genuinely tried to create a more locally accepted product line. At the same time, while they are trying to develop local products such as juices and Chinese tea, I think they’re still hanging too much on their core carbonated drinks.”

The biggest challenge facing businesses coming into China now, however, is digital disruption.  

Chinese consumers are accustomed to using digital payment systems, expect to be able to order almost every product online on established platforms, and have these products delivered to their door – often in less than 24 hours, says Tse. 

China’s level of technology acceptance and integration is unparalleled anywhere in the world outside of Silicon Valley. 

“If you’re headquartered outside of China, you don’t get a sense of the rapid digital disruption in China,” Tse says. “The local guys based in China know, and I’m sure they inform headquarters, but they don’t get it. They hear the words internet, mobile, digital payment, P2P (peer-to-peer); they hear the terms but don’t understand deeply the change in China.”

For those thinking they can play catch up or feel their way into the market, the first man in China’s consulting sector offers a last piece of advice: “The Chinese consumer won’t wait.” 

More

CHINAMacroReporter

September 26, 2022
China Coup: How Worried Should Xi Be?
‘Xi and the phrase #ChinaCoup trended on social media after tens of thousands of users spread unconfirmed rumors that the president was detained and overthrown by the China's People's Liberation Army.’
keep reading
September 18, 2022
'How do you spy on China?'
Many of you have asked about my own take on the issues I analyze in these pages and about my background. Today is some of both.I am honored to have been interviewed by the terrific Jeremy Goldkorn, editor-in-chief of The China Project. Below is part of that interview.
keep reading
September 5, 2022
Xi’s Dangerous Radical Secrecy
In a world of political hardball, investigative reporting, and tabloids, we know a lot (if not always accurate or unspun) about world leaders, especially those in functioning democracies. Not so with Xi Jinping.
keep reading
February 18, 2021
'Like It Or Not, America Is Still A Superpower'
‘The twentieth century was littered with the carcasses of foreign leaders and governments that misjudged the United States, from Germany (twice) and Japan to the Soviet Union to Serbia to Iraq. Perhaps the Chinese, careful students of history that they are, will not make the mistake that others have made in misjudging the United States.’
keep reading
February 16, 2021
'Is China experiencing an advance of the state sector?'
‘The value-added produced by state-owned enterprises has usually been in the range of 25-30% of China’s GDP. And what’s really striking about those numbers is that they just haven’t changed very much over the past 25 years. The share of China’s economic output being produced by SOEs today, under Xi Jinping, is not significantly different than it was under Hu Jintao, or even in the later years of Jiang Zemin.’
keep reading
February 16, 2021
‘China Blocked Jack Ma’s Ant IPO After Investigation Revealed Likely Beneficiaries’
‘Behind layers of opaque investment vehicles that own stakes in Ant Financial are a coterie of well-connected Chinese power players, including some with links to political families that represent a potential challenge to President Xi and his inner circle. Those individuals, along with Mr. Ma and the company’s top managers, stood to pocket billions of dollars from a listing that would have valued the company at more than $300 billion.’
keep reading
February 14, 2021
How to Keep U.S.-Chinese Confrontation From Ending in Calamity
'The two countries need to consider something akin to the procedures and mechanisms that the United States and the Soviet Union put in place to govern their relations after the Cuban missile crisis—but in this case, without first going through the near-death experience of a barely avoided war.'
keep reading
February 14, 2021
The United States, China, and Taiwan: A Strategy to Prevent War
‘We believe that a crisis is building over Taiwan and that it is becoming the most dangerous flashpoint in the world for a possible war that involved the United States of America, China, and probably other major powers.'
keep reading
February 13, 2021
Why China Will Go Green - Really
‘To Communist Party leaders, greenery increasingly aligns with their economic and political interests. China, a populous country that is cruelly lacking in clean water and arable farmland, and which hates having to rely so heavily on imported energy, has a selfish interest in embracing what President Xi Jinping calls “ecological civilisation”.’
keep reading
February 11, 2021
'The Biden Team Wants to Transform the Economy. Really.'
‘Biden and his more activist advisers hope to modernize key industries and counter an economic threat from China, swiftly emerging as the world’s other superpower. “The package that they put together is the closest thing we’ve had to a broad industrial policy for generations, really,” says Scott Paul, the president of the Alliance for American Manufacturing.’
keep reading
February 10, 2021
‘What the ‘Hong Kong Narrative’ gets wrong'
‘For a significant cohort of the [“pro-democracy”] protesters, the more accurate label would be “anti-China activists.” The one thing that seems to unite them is not a love of democracy, but a hatred of China.'
keep reading
February 8, 2021
Why the Anglosphere sees eye to eye on China
‘Some of America’s European allies are very wary of what they fear will be a new cold war with China. By contrast, the US is getting more support from the UK, Australia and Canada.’
keep reading
February 7, 2021
' "Longer Telegram" | To Counter China’s Rise, the U.S. Should Focus on Xi'
A strategy that focuses more narrowly on Xi, rather than the CCP as a whole, presents a more achievable objective.'
keep reading
February 7, 2021
'The Sources of Soviet Conduct'
'The main element of any United States policy toward the Soviet Union must be that of a long-term, patient but firm and vigilant containment of Russian expansive tendencies.’
keep reading
February 7, 2021
'Remarks by President Biden on America's Place in the World'
“We’ll confront China’s economic abuses; counter its aggressive, coercive action; to push back on China’s attack on human rights, intellectual property, and global governance.”“But we are ready to work with Beijing when it’s in America’s interest to do so. We will compete from a position of strength by building back better at home, working with our allies and partners, renewing our role in international institutions, and reclaiming our credibility and moral authority, much of which has been lost.”“That’s why we’ve moved quickly to begin restoring American engagement internationally and earn back our leadership position, to catalyze global action on shared challenges.”
keep reading
February 7, 2021
'In Search of Today’s George Kennan'
‘Kennan provided a framework to break through the bitter divide between those who believed America should return to its prewar isolationism, and those who believed the USSR was itching for a dramatic showdown with the capitalist west.’
keep reading
February 7, 2021
' "Longer Telegram" Sets Off Fierce Global Debate'
'The fierce global debate set off this week by a thought-provoking paper - “TheLonger Telegram: Toward a New American China Strategy” – has underscored the urgency and difficulty of framing a durable and actionable U.S. approach to China as the country grows more authoritarian, more self-confident and more globally assertive.'
keep reading
February 7, 2021
The 'Longer Telegram' & Its Discontents
Why everyone wants to be George Kennan‘In 1947 X penned his history-changing “Sources of Soviet Conduct” in Foreign Affairs,’ wrote Edward Luce in the Financial Times in 2018.‘The piece, which crystallised America’s cold war containment strategy, was the making of George F Kennan’s life-long reputation as a master of geopolitics.’‘ As the architect of a doctrine that won the cold war.’
keep reading
February 7, 2021
'Brookings experts analyze President Biden’s first foreign policy speech: Focus China'
'To respond effectively, Biden argued, America will need to rebuild leverage, e.g., by pursuing domestic renewal, investing in alliances, reestablishing U.S. leadership on the world stage, and restoring American authority in advocating for universal values.'
keep reading
February 7, 2021
'Why the ‘Longer Telegram’ Won’t Solve the China Challenge'
‘Perhaps the most problematic aspect of the 'Longer Telegram's' emphasis on Xi—“All U.S. political and policy responses to China therefore should be focused through the principal lens of Xi himself”—is the author’s conclusion that Washington should be seeking to escape from, and even try to effect the removal of, Xi’s leadership because that could restore U.S.-China relations to a potentially constructive path: “its pre-2013 path—i.e., the pre-Xi strategic status quo.” ’
keep reading
February 4, 2021
Why Beijing Is Bringing Big Tech to Heel
‘Beijing’s recent antitrust efforts are motivated less by worries about the tyrannical nature of monopoly power than by the belief that China’s tech giants are insufficiently committed to promoting the goal advanced by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) of transformative technological innovation—and thus may be undermining the effectiveness of Chinese industrial policy.’
keep reading
February 3, 2021
'Secretary of State Antony Blinken on U.S. Policy Toward China'
‘There’s no doubt that China poses the most significant challenge to us of any other country, but it’s a complicated one.’
keep reading
February 3, 2021
'Burma’s Coup and Biden’s Choice'
‘The top U.S. priority in Asia is limiting Beijing’s ability to control independent states like Burma, which is strategically situated in the Indo-Pacific. The U.S. response needs to take into account China’s regional designs.’
keep reading
February 3, 2021
'Myanmar, Burma and why the different names matter'
‘Unlike most of the world, the U.S. government still officially uses "Burma." '
keep reading
February 3, 2021
'Coup a further complication for tricky Myanmar-China ties'
‘Even if China played no role at all in ousting Suu Kyi, Beijing is likely to gain still greater sway over the country.’
keep reading
February 3, 2021
‘Beijing Won’t Let America “Compartmentalize” Climate Change'
‘‘You want China to take action on climate change?" asks Xi Jinping. "Let’s talk about what you’re going to give to get it.’’
keep reading
February 3, 2021
Burma: At the Center of the U.S.-China Competition
In today’s issue: 1. China Lays Out Its Position / 2. The U.S. Lays Out Its Position / 3. Burma: At the Center of the U.S.-China Competition / 4. Burma or Myanmar?
keep reading
February 3, 2021
'A Conversation with Politburo Member Yang Jiechi'
‘History and reality have shown time and again that these issues concern China's core interests, national dignity, as well as the sentiments of its 1.4 billion people. They constitute a red line that must not be crossed.’
keep reading
February 3, 2021
'National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan on U.S. Policy Toward China'
‘Being prepared to act as well to impose costs for what China is doing in Xinjiang, what it’s doing in Hong Kong, for the bellicosity of threats that it is projecting towards Taiwan.’
keep reading
February 3, 2021
'Coup Puts Myanmar at the Center of the U.S.-China Clash'
‘Chinese oil and gas pipelines snake across Myanmar from China’s landlocked Yunnan province to the Bay of Bengal—a route that Beijing wants to transform into a broader economic corridor with road and rail connections.’
keep reading
February 3, 2021
'Biden's whole-of-National Security Council China strategy'
'National security adviser Jake Sullivan is personally focused on China as a priority, building capacity across departments and agencies and running processes that break down old silos between foreign and domestic policy.'
keep reading
January 31, 2021
'Biden’s Nightmare May Be China'
‘The coming years represent the greatest risks since I began covering U.S.-China relations in the 1980s, partly because Xi is an overconfident, risk-taking bully who believes that the United States is in decline.’
keep reading
January 31, 2021
Opinion | Marco Rubio: 'China is exploiting U.S. capital markets and workers. Here's what Biden should do.'
‘China can finance its industrial ambitions with the deepest, most liquid capital markets in the world — our own.’
keep reading
January 31, 2021
The UK Stands Up, the U.S. Not So Much
“We have honored our profound ties of history and friendship with the people of Hong Kong, and we have stood up for freedom and autonomy—values both the U.K. and Hong Kong hold dear.” British Prime Minister Boris Johnson
keep reading
January 31, 2021
'U.S.-China Capital Flows Vastly Underestimated'
‘And yet, debates around US-China passive securities investment suffer from shortcomings similar to those inherent in the early debates about US-China bilateral FDI and VC: official data do not provide a clear picture for policymakers to understand the scope and patterns of two-way investment flows and stocks.’
keep reading
January 31, 2021
'Why U.S. Securities Investment in China is Vastly Underestimated'
‘The conduits of US securities investment in China that are obscured or ignored in the US Treasury International Capital (TIC) dataset constitute a majority of all holdings, so these figures vastly underestimate the true scope at the end of 2020.’
keep reading

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.