CHINAMacroReporter

Siri: 'Can The iPhone Prove President Trump's Wrong About U.S.-China Trade?'

[Malcolm Riddell's conversation with Yukon Huang] 'America's trade problems are not the consequence of China's policies.' 'How much of that $650 iPhone - which adds to China's trade surplus with the U.S. - actually originates and stays in China? — Only $25.'
by

|

CHINADebate

July 19, 2017
Siri: 'Can The iPhone Prove President Trump's Wrong About U.S.-China Trade?'
  • For decades, about 50% of U.S. imports of manufactured goods have come from Asia.
  • During this time China has risen from supplying 10% of those Asian goods to supplying 65%.
  • The reason: after joining WTO, China became Asia's assembly plant.
  • Companies ship components manufactured in other Asian countries to China for assembly and export as finished products.
  • And, the full price of those products - components as well as profits - go on China's trade balance, even though China's only economic benefit is the assembly.
  • Hence, China's actual trade surplus is smaller than stated, and, in fact, is a stand-in for Asia's overall trade surplus with the U.S.

Following what now appears to be the vain hope that China would solve the North Korean nuclear problem for him, President Trump seems to be tweeting up to a trade confrontation, perhaps even a trade war, with China.

But, just as he was wrong about China's being a currency manipulator, the President may also be wrong - albeit for more subtle reasons - about how much China itself actually contributes to the U.S. trade deficit.

Yukon Huang, senior fellow at the Carnegie Asia Program and former World Bank head in China, in laying out these subtle reasons, concludes that China's actual trade surplus with the U.S. is smaller than stated in trade statistics. Here's why...

For decades, U.S. imports of manufactured goods from Asia has remained pretty steady at between 45 and 50%.

What has changed is the share of those goods imported from China since it joined the WTO...

There are two possible reasons for this. One is that China simply beat out the other Asian nations.

The other - and real explanation - is that, after joining the WTO, China became the assembly plant of Asia, taking parts and components manufactured in other Asian countries, assembling them into finished products, and then exporting those products to the U.S.... 

‘China accounts for 65% of the exports from Asia to the United States.
'That 65% of exports from Asia to the United States does not represent the true value of these goods being produced in China, since most of these parts and components are actually being produced in Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Singapore, Malaysia, and the Philippines.
'China's only value-added is the labor and the assembly.'

Consider the case of the iPhone. Yukon breaks that $650 price tag down:

  • $325: the value of parts and components, mainly produced in South Korea and Japan.
  • $300: profit to Apple.$25: labor – the only added value to China's economy.
  • $25 to China! Yet, on the trade books, here's what happens...
‘You take a $650 iPhone, assembled, exported from China, and it comes to the United States. It shows up in the balance of payments, in the trade balance, as a $650 item deficit for the U.S. and a $650 surplus for China.
'But, how much of that $650 actually originates and stays in China? Only $25.' 

And, adding insult of a sort to injury...

'That money actually never really shows up in China, because the receipts are basically secured in the United States, but it never stays in the United States. It's basically transferred overseas, but in the trade books it shows up as a product from China, which costs $650.'

So, what do we have... 

  • The U.S. is importing as many Asia manufactured goods as ever - so, there has been no surge in Asian imports.
  • But, what's changed is that Asian manufacturers have been funneling their products to China - Asia's assembly plant  - for assembly and export.
  • So, on the books, it looks as if U.S. imports from China have exploded (please have a look again at the chart, above).
  • In reality, nothing has changed, except for China unfairly taking the blame for what is, in fact, Asia's usual trade surplus with the U.S.

More

CHINAMacroReporter

March 3, 2021
Missing: Has anyone seen Europe’s China plan?
‘Caught between Washington and Beijing, European capitals find themselves in lack of a strategic China policy.’
keep reading
February 28, 2021
Why Beijing was right to rein in Jack Ma's rogue Ant Group IPO
‘In July 2020, just before their IPO application, Ant Financial not only abandoned the word "financial" and renamed themselves Ant Group, they attempted to list not on the Shanghai or Shenzhen exchanges, where financial institutions list, but rather on the Shanghai STAR Market, which was created as an exchange for high-tech innovators.’
keep reading
February 27, 2021
The rivalry between America and China will hinge on South-East Asia
‘In the rivalry between China and America, there will be a main zone of contention: South-East Asia. Of the two competitors, China looks the more likely prize-winner.'
keep reading
March 9, 2017
So many twists and turns to the China Housing markets story
[CHINADebate Presentation] One of the highlights in our recent 'In Pursuit of Patterns' series of client notes, showed that the land sales growth had tended to lead the price growth and a significant increase in land sales would lead, with a lag, to the subsequent correction in prices.—Almost everyone on the outside seems to have missed the biggest bull market in China housing in 2016, culminating in policy tightening cycle kicking in at the end of the year. But what's next?
keep reading
February 27, 2017
Is The U.S. Ceding Global Leadership To China?
'China isn't positioned to replace the U.S. as a global leader anytime soon.'—Hard on President Trump's 'American First' inaugural address, Xi Jinping gave a rousing paean to globalism at the World Economic Forum. And, immediately the hot question became: 'Is the U.S. ceding global leadership to China?' Yes and no, says Bill Overholt of the Harvard Asia Center. Yes, the U.S. is ceding global leadership. No, China won’t replace the U.S. What will replace the U.S. is ‘G-Zero’, a world with no single global leader. Not China, not the U.S. So, can his critics lay this outcome at President Trump’s feet?
keep reading
February 15, 2017
C-to-C Internet Commerce- From Taobao Shops to Taobao Villages
One is some of the local government-owned SOEs are the sources for overcapacity. The reason is because the local government also wants to ensure there's some degree of employment locally, and perhaps some source of taxation. The Chinese government is now going to need to start the so-called supply-side economics to try to consolidate overcapacity in a number of sectors. It's going to impinge on the interests of many of these local SOEs as well as the local governments who own them.
keep reading
February 15, 2017
How SOEs & Local Governments Create Overcapacity
One is some of the local government-owned SOEs are the sources for overcapacity. The reason is because the local government also wants to ensure there's some degree of employment locally, and perhaps some source of taxation. The Chinese government is now going to need to start the so-called supply-side economics to try to consolidate overcapacity in a number of sectors. It's going to impinge on the interests of many of these local SOEs as well as the local governments who own them.
keep reading
February 15, 2017
Why SOE Reform is So Tough
'...SOEs need to reform, because on one hand, many of them have achieved a lot for China. On the other hand, they've actually created quite a lot of harm, in particular in the areas of overcapacity but also in the areas of corruption we've talked about.'
keep reading
February 2, 2017
AmCham China Chairmen's View From China in D.C. 2017
[AmCham China & CHINADebate U.S.—China Trade/Business Series 2017] Terrific insights from leaders on the ground in China. While in D.C. the Chairmen joined us in a panel discussion and individual interviews about U.S. business in China, U.S.-China relations, trade, and much more. We present their views in a 13 part series. Sheryl WuDunn, business executive, lecturer, best-selling author, and winner of the Pulitzer Prize moderated.
keep reading
February 1, 2017
'Chinese Politics In The Xi Jinping Era'
[Malcolm Riddell Interviewed Cheng Li] 'If you ask any taxi driver in Beijing, Shanghai, or Guangzhou, he or she will tell you – with accuracy – which leader belongs to which faction. : 'China is a one–party state, but that does not necessarily mean Chinese leadership is a monolithic group with leaders who have the same ideas, same background, same world views, same politics. No, they're divided.'
keep reading
December 7, 2016
First 100 Days: Do Not Provoke China
The First 100 Days interview series features Pacific Council experts addressing the top foreign policy issues facing the incoming Trump administration.: Warns of the potential for new conflicts if Donald Trump follows through with his campaign promises regarding China.
keep reading
October 18, 2016
How Alibaba, Xiaomi, & Tencent are Changing the Rules of Business
[An Interview of Ed Tse, the author of 'China's Disruptors: Alibaba, Xiaomi, & Tencent... how innovative 'Disruptor' companies are restructuring China's economy.' ] The real force in Chinese economy is increasingly private companies, not SOEs. / Leading private Chinese companies are innovative and ambitious
keep reading
July 14, 2016
How 'Brexit' Will Impact China's Economy
David Dollar gives you fresh insights to better incorporate Brexit's impact into your analyses of China and global economies & markets, including: 1. Why, after the Brexit vote, did the Shanghai Stock Market fall only 1%? 2. How will Brexit affect the value of the RMB and China's currency policy? 3. How will Brexit impact trade with the EU, China’s largest trading partner? 4. Why, in the larger geopolitical perspective, could China be the big winner from Brexit?
keep reading
July 2, 2016
China housing: boom, bust, or bubble-or...?
100s of Cities Bubble Up & Down As Policy Makers Press the Levers China hasn’t collapsed. And, the bubble hasn’t burst because there may not be just one big real estate bubble. Instead, there are 100s of sizable cities, each moving in its own cycle, each responding to how its local policymakers stimulate & tighten-stimulate & tighten, and each having performance divergent from that of other cities. Watch here to see how city-level markets bubble up and bubble down...
keep reading

Heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.